Jérémie Corbier wrote: > Thanks for your bug report. We do not support manual installation of > libraries, especially when this library is as critical as pam. You > should also note that Dapper ships with pam 0.79 modified by 40 patches > including the one that adds @include support. > > ** Changed in: Ubuntu > Sourcepackagename: None => pam > Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected > > If 40 patches are applied, maybe they should be sent upstream and see if they are accepted. I personally liked the @include idea. If they are rejected, some may wonder why and reconsider their purpose... It must also be noted than pam 0.79 is now pretty old and that some modules need a higher version than that, and that's why manual installation is sometime needed.
Bonne journée et merci -- pam.d configuration files don't comply to standard https://launchpad.net/bugs/55705 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
