from http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/09/14/%23ubuntu-desktop.txt:
[10:10] <fta2> slomo, hi, will you put libvpx 0.9.2 in maverick? [10:11] <slomo> fta2: would be a good idea, yes .. [10:25] <slomo> fta2: ok, well, if you have the time to get it updated... it's definitely a good idea to do so [10:26] <fta2> slomo, what's left to be done? you already have it in the gst ppa (and i have it in the 4 chromium ppas, it's working just fine) [10:27] <slomo> fta2: no idea, ask someone who knows the ubuntu procedures better than me :) [10:27] <slomo> the package is ready, if anything is left it's paperwork [10:27] <fta2> didrocks, ^^ [10:28] <didrocks> fta2: can you summarize quicky please? I didn't follow the conversation, it's a new package/feature? [10:30] <fta2> didrocks, libvpx 0.9.1 -> 0.9.2 bump, lots of performance improvements, welcomed for chromium for the video codecs (WebM) [10:30] <didrocks> fta2: are there new features or just bugfix? [10:30] <slomo> and bugfixes, including some rather important ones [10:30] <slomo> is a performance improvement a bugfix or a new feature? ;) [10:30] <fta2> didrocks, and it's been tested for at least a week without issues [10:31] <didrocks> slomo: I wouldn't say a feature ;) [10:31] <didrocks> if it's that, you just can sync from experimental [10:31] <didrocks> fta2: requestsync [10:31] <didrocks> no paperwork needed apart from describing in the bug why you want it to get synced -- please sync libvpx 0.9.2-1 from debian experimental (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
