Am 10.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Matthew East:
> ordinarily the process is not to update the website until the
> package is updated. In this case given that the PDF file has
> accidentally used the newer version, I would go ahead and update the
> html version too to avoid the inconsistency that Klaus has pointed out.

IMHO the severity of the problem should justify an immediate update of 
the package anyway.
Why severe? For several reasons, each one alone should justify a fix:
1: The manual is lagging at least two versions behind the software.
2: The pdf formatting is broken: important config-lines are truncated.
3: Several steps are missing, that are absolutely required to get the 
samba server running as domain controller (see the other bug reports for 
samba).

Klaus

-- 
Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579851
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to