I had a disucssion with Debian and upstream about a very similar
application some time ago where we agreed that moving it into a seperate
package was no option because the application does not do nearly enough
(important tasks) on its own to be of any use outside the scope of
kdepim-runtime.
That in mind I do not think that 2. is an option here, 3. is either
because it would just be wrong limiting the description to but one part
of the package (not even the most important one really). Additionally
since akonaditray does not autostart by default a desktop file is
absolutely necessary, which pretty much eliminates 4.
One could however enhance the description a bit more to cover
akonaditray. Supposedly the description is a bit dated and akonaditray
only got added to kdepim-runtime after the description was written. Of
course that only improves the situation a bit, the fact that software
center and the package description are talking about two completely
different components remains.
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
Description: Akonaditray
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602705
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
