Il 08/07/2010 17:22, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto: >> option allowing the power users to switch from the default fixed timeout to >> client defined timeouts is easy to implement and > doesn't disturb anybody that might not care. "why is that so much of an > issue?". But once again you won't reply. > > There is no strong reason to not accept such changes
But we are still discussing... > out of the fact > that extra code means extra bugs and the notify-osd team could not be > wanting to deal with those. Which bugs such change could hide? We are talking about few lines of code... This is the usual excuse for not doing so, otherwise we should stop software development due to possible bugs introductions or regressions. The point is that the Ubuntu team reject everything that is not coming from themselves, right or wrong it doesn't matter. -- notify-send ignores the expire timeout parameter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
