Il 08/07/2010 17:22, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto:
>> option allowing the power users to switch from the default fixed timeout to 
>> client defined timeouts is easy to implement and
> doesn't disturb anybody that might not care. "why is that so much of an 
> issue?". But once again you won't reply.
>
> There is no strong reason to not accept such changes

But we are still discussing...

> out of the fact
> that extra code means extra bugs and the notify-osd team could not be
> wanting to deal with those.

Which bugs such change could hide? We are talking about few lines of 
code... This is the usual excuse for not doing so, otherwise we should 
stop software development due to possible bugs introductions or 
regressions. The point is that the Ubuntu team reject everything that is 
not coming from themselves, right or wrong it doesn't matter.

-- 
notify-send ignores the expire timeout parameter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to