On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:03:55PM -0000, arand wrote:
> For the released 10.04 I was planning on just grabbing the commit in
> question , since I'm not sure if a new version with more changes would
> go well with the updating policy.
OK, great. 1.41.12 does fix a number of high priority bugs beyond the
commit which you've grabbed, but it does introduce one, which will be
fixed in 1.41.13 (to be released in a few days).
The unfixed bugs in Ubuntu's e2fsprogs are probably only going to
matter for server workloads, and that's OK, because the 2.6.32
kernel's ext4 is missing so many bug fixes it's really not going to be
ready for server-class workloads anyway. (Hint: take a look at all of
the ext4 patches which Red Hat rawhide has taken for 2.6.32.)
- Ted
--
User cancel of fsck gives: "fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting
block group checksum"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
