Le mardi 04 mai 2010 à 12:44 +0000, Cefn a écrit : > The main features I'm using are the Scale feature, especially with > window grouping by application (Expose-like behaviour). > > I quite like the visual effects but I could do without them from a > productivity point of view. Scale I can't do without. It is critical to > me managing large numbers of windows simultaneously (typical is 30 or > more, 20 firefox + 4 File Manager + IM + IDE + etc. etc.). > > I found Gnome shell to be a bit clumsy but I'm optimistic for the > future. It's a nice approach and cold map well to the way I work, but > wasn't really stable or well-documented enough to use when I tried it a > month or so ago. I'm already using Gnome-do at the heart of my system. > > If I drop Compiz is there a way to get Netbook and Gnome Shell to play > ball and is there a stable version? Until then, Compiz compositing > works, so why reinvent the wheel, especially if that wheel is > incompatible with previous wheels?
The issue isn't in gnome-shell nor netbook-launcher TBH, it's more on clutter side for using glx that isn't compatible (mutter wm is using a clutter-based glx effect, so it's compatible). This is more something to deal with upstream. But you got a bug, I'm just giving you the cause :) -- Lucid netbook-launcher unbelievably slow on hardware accelerated desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
