Ah, an eCryptfs mount inside of another eCryptfs mount. I don't think I would recommend that. :)
I'm doing some testing right now to see how well it works, but I have to say that it is not something I normally test for. I'm almost sure that Dustin is correct in his assumption that filename encryption is the issue. Another potential problem from this setup is kernel stack size. The VFS is calling into eCryptfs which is calling back into eCryptfs which is calling into ext4 or whatever your local filesystem is. This generates quite a large stack and I think that you may run into some issues where the stack overflows. -- Problem with an ecryptfs directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
