I've chatted with upstream on IRC about the licensing issue, and requested the following:
1) A verbatim copy of each license under which materials are distributed to be included in the tarball 2) For those files that cannot represent their license correctly internally (mostly .blend files), that the license under which they are distributed be described somewhere else in the upstream tarball (COPYING, LICENSE, README, or somewhere) 3) That the licenses not all be conflated into a single COPYING file which requires detailed review to determine if any of the licenses happen to match licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses/ -- [needs-packaging] Yo Frankie! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
