My comment on comments in #45ཿ * "the original bug report was about the embedded bitmaps" - actually the original bug said it "makes sites look ugly in Firefox and other browsers" * although the replacement tahoma font works fine for non-bold and bold on LCD monitors, on LCD monitors with sub-pixel antialiasing, there is essentially no difference between normal weight and bold weight.
Please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/50529 So although bug 514493 is about restricting tahoma to wine, should we not also be reporting the LCD-bold issue upstream and getting that fixed? Should this have a different bug? -- ttf-tahoma-replacement makes some web-sites look ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412195 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
