It's a large list of new features and UI changes (we are in UI freeze,
too, now), which could potentially introduce new bugs again. How much
has this been tested in a karmic environment by the community?
Would it be adequate to backport the two major bug fixes? E. g. bug
409407 looks like an one-liner patch to fix an URL.
How does 2.1.1 work in terms of stability and usability compared to 2.2?
Does 2.2 fix release goals of Karmic which aren't in 2.1.1?
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Amarok 2.2 feature freeze exception
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424328
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
