Tormod Volden ha scritto: >> In your example above, if your /dev/sdc is not part of an array, kernel will >> not >> remove it. If it happens this is a bug. >> If /dev/sda and /dev/sdb are part of an array, they will be removed, and >> this is >> *not* a bug, why it should be..? > > This is what I do not understand. The way I read the patch and its > description, if this array is not used for root, -Z will not be used on > it, so they will not be removed.
Yes, apologies for the confusion, if this array is not used for root, -Z will not be used on it, otherwise my above sentence is true. >> Workaround (patch) that I added in the latest revision isn't elegant, but >> imho >> it fixed that issue. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug and write a >> testcase. > > I will leave to Christian to judge if this workaround fixes his issue. > > I am starting to wondering if you are talking about the issue in the > linked Debian report, which might be somewhat different. I notice that Why are they different? They are the same issue, mdraid out of dmraid raw partitions or no-raid installation out of dmraid raw partitions. > Other question: Why the special-casing of the root partition, shouldn't > the same logic apply to all partitions? > Yes, the logic is the same, but the special-casing prevents the boot failure when there is a wrong setup. Cheers, Giuseppe. -- Dual-boot install using mdadm root fails to boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
