I just wanted to chip in with a +1 to Matthew. I was (am?) one of the more vocal critics of the name decision, and stated my position in very strong terms above (something i later apologised for), but I too think that the whole point of the bug report was to submit the issue to the sanction of the community council. Since the CC discussed it and reached a solution, even one that i personally don't agree with, i think the bug report should be closed.
You can't win 'em all, and i think that community is very much about accepting things even when they don't go your way. just my two cents... On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Paul Sladen<ubu...@paul.sladen.org> wrote: > Matthew: Indeed, if you (as one of the proponents of the issue) are > willing and comfortable with closing the bug now, then I would recommend > doing so---it would solve an impasse in the way that corporate closure > cannot; and the item can finally be removed from the CC agenda. > > -- > "Ubuntu One" name creates confusion > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375345 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem -- "Ubuntu One" name creates confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
