Stas i ran a test yesterday and found that fpm patches cleanly ontop all the other patches on the 5.2.6 sources (u9.04).
So i've been going a different way to both of you. It's all in a blog post http://dreamcat4.jottit.com/ Many of the compile flags for apache are worth including. I have been planning to re-group the compile flags into $common_config, $web_config, and then the existing apache2-build target will also have less flags. A new fpm-build target share the $common_config and $web_config, and just append the the '--fpm' switch to ./configure. The new variable '$web_config' will be the flags taken out from the apache2-build target which aren't apache-specific (libjpeg, mysql, sqlite, etc). These flags include important functionality for a php distribution so i think we probably need them. I believe the path of least resistance is to add a new 'fpm-build' target to the existing php5 source package because it's already got all these external dependencies set up. ( libjpeg.so, libgd.so, .... ) To have a completely separate 'php5-fpm' source package, mshadle, it sounds like a good idea but there's some very popular php stuff (eg wordpress, lightbox) that needs these image libraries. You'll also need to support 3 or 4 of the most popular databases. Performance with these things included should be fine. However make sure to specify the "--without-mm" flag. -- [needs-packaging] php-fpm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
