Refresh is "a state of mind", and this action could be between zero and Inf+. We should take a decision, split this distribution of times in two parts, what people think about a long-wait and not. 3 sec? 4 sec? more?
Local browsing, low number of files in a folder: 1. Joe open nautilus window and browse files... 2. Joe click on refresh button and all is good (less than 1 sec) Local browsing, high number of files in a folder: 1. Joe open nautilus window for last year photos (around 1000) 2. Time step over 3 seconds, nautilus show a transient message with a stop button 3. Joe click stop Network browsing for windirectories: 1. Joe open nautilus window and browse network dirs 2. Time step over 3 seconds, a new transient message with a stop button.. 3. Joe don't click, transient message/window disappear after files come up -- Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
