I think the DISTRIB_RELEASE value is intended behaviour. As far as I
know, the idea was to not break the "Release" field for programs/scripts
which parse it.
It's consistent with what dapper has:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 6.06.2 LTS
Release: 6.06
Codename: dapper
The issue and issue.net should be fixed, though, indeed.
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
Releases files does not contain "LTS" tag
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225735
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
