Well with all due respect, how is the average user (like me) supposed to evaluate it? I would suggest that if two people involved with the same bug have made the mistake of paying attention to an irrelevant (should that be "redundant and pointless") rating, there are probably quite a few more out there. I know this isn't your fault, but wouldn't it be worthwhile having a useful rating there rather than something nobody apparantly takes notice of?
On 3/24/09, Colin Watson <cjwat...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 07:35:20AM -0000, inksmithy wrote: >> tasksel (2.73ubuntu17) jaunty; *urgency=low* > > Oh, well, that's completely irrelevant so who cares? The only purpose of > the urgency field in Ubuntu is to cause the source package to be > scheduled for building marginally quicker. As a result it's almost > always just set to the default, and so people shouldn't waste time by > worrying about its value. > > -- > [master] tasksel removes all Ubuntu-desktop dependencies without > confirmation dialog > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150252 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug. > -- Sent from my mobile device -- [master] tasksel removes all Ubuntu-desktop dependencies without confirmation dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
