On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:29:29AM -0000, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2009/1/29 Alexander Sack <[email protected]>: > > Michael, what's your opinion on "status" for init.d script? > > The Debian network-manager init script has a "status" option. > > Which reminds me, that it would probably be a good idea if Debian and > Ubuntu used the same name for the sysv init script (NetworkManager vs. > network-manager). > > Would you mind merging the Debian 0.7.0 packages? > I think they have some nice improvements (general cruft removal from > debian/, symbols files, updated to newer Debian policy (e.g. Homepage > field and stuff). >
I suggestd multiple times to join our efforts, but you never opted into it ... usually debian is behind which is why i suggested to use the ubuntu branches to work on. For the sake of getting this done, I am fine to move this in a debian hosted archive. Only technical issue is svn. Merging and doing distro specific branches is just too cumbersome that it stays efficient imo. Of course I would prefer to go for launchpad, but given that new NM is in git, we can just go for alioth git. Please give me heads up what you think. - Alexander -- one should have /etc/init.d/network-manager status option as well https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283416 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
