Hello Scott,
Thanks for the explanation. Why is ubuntu not using "preload" ? FYI, I replaced "readahead" by "preload" on the below system and it made it faster: - CPU: AMD Athlon XP 1500+ - mem: 392 MB - Ubuntu version: hardy - minimum total size of the used files of the tracked processes: 4MB > Message du 27/01/09 13:45 > De : "Scott James Remnant" > A : jerome.bo...@wanadoo.fr > Copie à : > Objet : [Bug 318505] Re: readahead default configuration hurts the > systemperformance > > > I prune the kernel modules out of the readahead lists before I generate > them, sometimes I admittedly get it wrong, but this is generally human > error not a bug > > ** Changed in: readahead (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Invalid > > -- > readahead default configuration hurts the system performance > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318505 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > -- readahead default configuration hurts the system performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
