On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 13:27 +0000, Jacob Peddicord wrote: > James: > > Thanks for the response. I'll file a Debian bug when I return from > classes today to see what the maintainer thinks. However, in the > meantime, would it be suitable to go with the most recent solution but > without the template/translation changes, and then merge/sync the Debian > version when it is updated? I think the debconf dialog (and the > Recommends field) should appropriately hint that an inetd server needs > to be installed, even though the extra string would be helpful.
Well, I haven't fully reviewed the package yet to make sure that not depending on an inetd is both reasonable and worthwhile, though the debconf question certainly indicates that it is. Also, I'm not sure how to handle the case when someone installs without recommends, and answers yes to the question (which defaults to yes, and they may well not have seen it). You are entirely correct that it's not possible to detect this case in the config script, but I wonder if there is a better way to handle it. Thanks for working on this, it's not the easiest change to make, otherwise I may well have uploaded it already. I'm keen to get any feedback from the Debian maintainer, as they know the package better. Thanks, James -- gwhois depends on inetd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
