Jonathan Thomas <echidna...@kubuntu.org> writes: > See the last comment here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132713
Note the URL doesn't claim that it is policy not to support the Karma, just that the work hasn't been done yet. Lets forget that, though. There's a much deeper problem. Responding to someone who feels slighted at the short shrift you've given them with a second one-liner shows an unique sense of style. Remind me to recommend you for a job in public relations. Oh wait! -- slaps thigh -- you already have one. When you do stuff like this, it reflects on the whole project. Every Ubuntu release breaks my existing hardware worse, and in each case it is a known bug, sometimes known for years. In other cases, I've been waiting for years for simple bug reports to be dealt with only to have them closed with some unresponsive message from a person who clearly dealt with 300 other bugs that same day and might not even understand the original issue. Project management clearly does not understand that if you intend to have people think your product is high quality, you cannot pretend closing bug reports equals fixing bugs. Perry -- Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
