On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:11:45AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote: > On 12/08/2008 09:21 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote: > > Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 01:56:01, John Vivirito a écrit : > >> Added Ubuntu task and assigned asac to review and push as needed > >> > > > > There is already iceweasel-firegpg in unstable/main and jaunty/universe. > > Isn't it a better idea to merge it instead of repackaging it from > > scratch? > > > We dont use iceweasel we use abrowser. We shouldnt have to fix each of
Where did I say that we use iceweasel? > the iceweasel packages to support other browsers since at this time it > only depends on iceweasel and the packages are not updated but ours > are. Right, I understand (this looks like duplicate work though). Then you may want to drop from the archive several iceweasel-* packages that landed in jaunty. > We dont merge any mozilla apps from debian and we havee it so they get > our packages. "it" == firegpg? "they" == debian? Why would Debian get our firegpg package? -- Lionel Le Folgoc - https://launchpad.net/~mrpouit EEBA 555E 0CDE 92BB 3AF4 4AB3 45A0 357B 5179 5910 -- [needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
