OlivierP Jean-Yves is completely correct regarding trademarks. Noone stops you from using the sources under GPL3, but only Jean-Yves can let you use the name "Mail Notification" (assuming it's a valid trademark of course).
Though there is of course, a potential iceweasel situation here - i.e. Ubuntu could choose to distribute the patched sources under a new name because of such issues. Jean-Yves - am I right in assuming that your resistance applies mostly to this patch, and not to all patches in general? Or better - what IS the exact trademark license, really? Can ubuntu ship MN with security fixes or not, for example? Where is the limit? /Mikael tis 2008-10-14 klockan 23:55 +0000 skrev Jean-Yves Lefort: > The GPLv3 obviously does not forbid to use a trademark as the name of a > covered work. You're confusing trademark and licensing issues. > -- IMAP/POP3+SSL/TLS are disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
