I have been debugging this further and discovered the problem is not
what I thought it was. I am now reproducing the problem with both the
Ubuntu/Edgy version of amanda and the Debian/Sarge version of amanda.
However, the problem does occur uniquely to the Ubuntu/Edgy client
machine, so it is something unique to either amanda or the filesystems
on that machine.
The specific error message I get to the log file e-mailed to the server
account is:
estimate of level 1 failed: -1
and so all filesystems result in "RESULTS MISSING".
I do not get any error messages to the amanda logs that indicate more
specifically what the problem is.
If I disable the Ubuntu client, everything works correctly.
From:
backup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
new AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR November
11, 2006
Date:
Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:21:41 -0500
(EST)
*** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [label new07 or new tape not found in rack].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush to flush them to tape.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: new07.
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fea sdb1 lev -1 FAILED [no estimate]
fea sdb2 lev -1 FAILED [no estimate]
fea sda2 lev -1 FAILED [no estimate]
fea sda1 RESULTS MISSING
fea hda1 RESULTS MISSING
fea hda2 RESULTS MISSING
fea hdb1 RESULTS MISSING
fea hdb2 RESULTS MISSING
fea7 sda1 RESULTS MISSING
fea7 sda5 RESULTS MISSING
fea7 sda7 RESULTS MISSING
fea7 sda9 RESULTS MISSING
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
-------- -------- --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:01
Run Time (hrs:min) 0:01
Dump Time (hrs:min) 0:00 0:00 0:00
Output Size (meg) 0.1 0.0 0.1
Original Size (meg) 0.1 0.0 0.1
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
(level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Dumped 3 1 2 (1:1 4:1)
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 1400.0 185.2 2826.1
Tape Time (hrs:min) 0:00 0:00 0:00
Tape Size (meg) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tape Used (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Filesystems Taped 0 0 0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) -- -- --
NOTES:
planner: disk fea:hda1, estimate of level 1 failed: -1.
planner: disk fea:sdb2, estimate of level 1 failed: -1.
planner: disk fea:sdb1, estimate of level 1 failed: -1.
planner: disk fea:sda2, estimate of level 1 failed: -1.
planner: disk fea:sda1, estimate of level 1 failed: -1.
planner: Incremental of fea7:sda1 bumped to level 2.
planner: fea sda2 20061111 0 [dumps too big, 10699610 KB, full dump
delayed]
planner: fea sdb2 20061111 0 [dumps too big, 9480560 KB, full dump
delayed]
planner: fea sdb1 20061111 0 [dumps too big, 9961600 KB, full dump
delayed]
planner: Full dump of fea:hda1 promoted from 14 days ahead.
planner: Full dump of fea:hdb1 promoted from 14 days ahead.
planner: Full dump of fea7:sda5 promoted from 5 days ahead.
planner: Full dump of fea:sda1 promoted from 14 days ahead.
planner: Full dump of fea7:sda10 promoted from 14 days ahead.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS
KB/s
-------------------------- ---------------------------------
------------
fea hda1 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea hda2 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea hdb1 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea hdb2 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea sda1 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea sda2 -1 FAILED
---------------------------------------
fea sdb1 -1 FAILED
---------------------------------------
fea sdb2 -1 FAILED
---------------------------------------
fea7 sda1 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea7 sda10 0 10 10 -- 0:00 183.7 N/A
N/A
fea7 sda5 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea7 sda6 4 120 120 -- 0:004247.0 N/A
N/A
fea7 sda7 MISSING
--------------------------------------
fea7 sda8 1 10 10 -- 0:00 540.8 N/A
N/A
fea7 sda9 MISSING
--------------------------------------
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p3)
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 21:49 +0000, Jeremy Teale wrote:
> Hello and thank you for reporting. Your initial description lacks the
> detail necessary to diagnose the problem. Without some sort of error
> message it will be hard to reproduce and confirm the bug. Please specify
> the error/info message you get that is indicative of the version
> incompatibilities.
>
> ** Changed in: amanda (Ubuntu)
> Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
>
--
James D. Freels, Ph.D.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.comsol.com/stories/hfir/
--
Edgy versions are in compatible with older version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71255
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
