I apologize if anything I wrote was disrespectful. The bug was closed and I was trying to argue forcefully that it be reopened. In the company where I work discussions about whether a bug should be fixed or not are appropriately recorded in the bug db. I was not aware that was not normal practice for Ubuntu. I will not do so again.
Douglas On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 22:29 +0000, Bruce Cowan wrote: > May I remind you of the Code of Conduct - > http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct, specifically the "Be > respectful" part. > > Arguements such as this should be kept to the forums, not bug reports. > > Nothing is forcing you to use Ubuntu, if you don't like the fact that > LTS doesn't mean new software, then don't use it. > > Of course if you really wanted this, you could build firefox 2.0 > yourself with a different package name (firefox2). The only person who > has the obigation to fix a "bug" is yourself - > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html > > Following on from what Martin said, I notice that Breezy now has the 1.5 > branch of Firefox, but that was for security reasons. > > To be honest, Firefox 2.0 isn't much upon 1.5 anyway. > -- Firefox 2.0 https://launchpad.net/bugs/68158 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
