> > However, it was not possible to build the module for custom kernels
> > from this. 
> 
> How's that not using non-ubuntu sources?

Ah ok, now I got you. Yes, you're right, I used a vanilla kernel source
(dapper default kernel is not working at all on my hw). However, I
thought the fglrx-kernel-source package is available exactly for being
able to build the module for custom kernels, isn't it?

Sure, it is not possible to support every possible combo, I'm
maintaining some packages for my company, so I know that very well - but
if it's possible to fix a problem, why should this be refused? Just
because one does not _need_ to do it as it's not an official feature?
Well... I don't want to rub it in - just think about it ;o)

Guido Nickels

-- 
Guido Nickels               |  Tel: +49 (22 33) 99 40 70
Hans-Böckler-Straße 52-54   |  Fax: +49 (22 33) 99 40 71
50354 Hürth                 |  www.kernel-oops.de

-- 
Build of fglrx module fails
https://launchpad.net/bugs/45563

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to