On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 10:46 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > > se_desc loop check is wrong, it relies on the desc always has > the expected name to end of the loop. It works because the device tree > has the expected name as of now, but this may not be always true. > > Drop se_desc by moving the check into probe and fix the loop check. > > Reported-by: Andrew Goodbody <[email protected]> > Cc: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Applied to -next, thanks.
