Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2025 4:50 pm > To: Maniyam, Dinesh <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Simon <[email protected]>; Simon Glass > <[email protected]>; Tom Rini <[email protected]>; Chee, Tien Fong > <[email protected]>; Hea, Kok Kiang <[email protected]>; Ng, > Boon Khai <[email protected]>; Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan > <[email protected]>; Lim, Jit Loon <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm: mach-socfpga: misc: improve help text and > usage > examples > > [CAUTION: This email is from outside your organization. Unless you trust the > sender, do not click on links or open attachments as it may be a fraudulent > email > attempting to steal your information and/or compromise your computer.] > > On 8/21/25 5:35 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Dinesh Maniyam <[email protected]> > > > > The existing 'bridge' command help was incomplete and contained a > > spelling error. This patch updates the help text to clearly describe > > the available bridge bit positions and their corresponding masks: > > The command was primarily written for CV/AV , that's why it was incomplete for > newer SoCs. Instead of the bit handling, why not add support for symbolic name > handling instead ? > > Add 'bridge list' to print supported bridges per SoC. > > Add 'bridge set' which handles bridge=state parameters, e.g. 'bridge set > h2f=1 f2h=0 ...'. That will be future proof and scale.
I get the point, improving the bridges command will help to support newer SoCs. Let me work on it. Thanks Dinesh
