On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:46:36AM +0300, Wadim Egorov wrote: > > > On 8/14/25 11:44 AM, Wadim Egorov wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On 6/2/25 2:31 PM, Martin Schwan wrote: > > > Add a bootmeth driver which supports booting A/B system with RAUC as > > > their update client. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwan <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > boot/Kconfig | 51 ++++++ > > > boot/Makefile | 1 + > > > boot/bootmeth_rauc.c | 432 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 484 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/boot/Kconfig b/boot/Kconfig > > > index > > > 30eb5b328d7ad8a73a2e84812dd7853b66039164..a610cf9faf99cd5480f94dcac89c3401cca394ae > > > 100644 > > > --- a/boot/Kconfig > > > +++ b/boot/Kconfig > > > @@ -855,6 +855,57 @@ config EXPO > > > The expo can be presented in graphics form using a > > > vidconsole, or in > > > text form on a serial console. > > > +config BOOTMETH_RAUC > > > + bool "Bootdev support for RAUC A/B systems" > > > + default y if BOOTSTD_FULL > > > > I noticed that the merge 009d7722ffd7 ("Merge patch series "bootstd: New > > bootmeth for RAUC A/B systems"") deleted the above line. > > > > Was it on purpose? > > Nvm, missed your comment > > [trini: Don't enable by default]. > > What would be wrong about it to enable it by default?
It is a lot of global size growth. And since the system still needs to be installed with RAUC in mind, enabling it globally didn't seem worth the size increase. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
