On 26/06/2025 12:14, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 6/26/25 12:49 PM, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
ret maybe used uninitialised in some cases so instead
initialise it first to prevent this.
I don't believe that's true, can you tell us which code path(s) could
trigger this because I didn't find one the 2min I spent reading the code.
No error path taken before line 563, ret is still not assigned to.
remaining == 0 which could come from being passed 0 on the command line,
line 518, unless there is a check for that that I missed?
Code reaches line 591 without assigning to ret.
Andrew
This issue was found by Smatch.
Seems like a false positive to me?
Cheers,
Quentin
