On 18/06/2025 15:57, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 09:15:54AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:


On 6/17/25 11:23, [email protected] wrote:
From: Pieter Van Trappen <[email protected]>

In fpga.c, change debug() calls to puts() for important user
feedback. In zynqpl.c, change 'up to' to 'above' which corrects this
confusing or wrong statement.

Signed-off-by: Pieter Van Trappen <[email protected]>
---
   cmd/fpga.c            | 20 ++++++++++----------
   drivers/fpga/zynqpl.c |  2 +-
   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmd/fpga.c b/cmd/fpga.c
index 9dc7b63db5d..2c2a63524de 100644
--- a/cmd/fpga.c
+++ b/cmd/fpga.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static int do_fpga_check_params(long *dev, long *fpga_data, 
size_t *data_size,
        debug("%s %d, %d\n", __func__, argc, cmdtp->maxargs);
        if (argc != cmdtp->maxargs) {
-               debug("fpga: incorrect parameters passed\n");
+               puts("fpga: incorrect parameters passed\n");

I think all of these should be moved to log_err that you should be able to
control verbosity.

Tom: I think this is where you want to go right?

Sounds right, thanks.


Right I will amend accordingly in a v2.

I'm trying to compile now that it's more than some tweaks and I notice many (fixable) errors in the drivers/fpga files such as missing time.h includes, spotted by gcc 14.2 (x86_64). I'm on the next branch.

Is this due to my gcc being too recent or is something else going on? I don't mind patching these in case that's welcomed; let me know.

Thanks, Pieter

Reply via email to