On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:04:28AM +0000, 牛 志宏 wrote:

> Yes, this is a new OS currently being developed with plans to support Linux 
> compatibility.
> Registers a0 and a1 pass the boot core ID and DTB address respectively, 
> following a de facto standard shared by both the SBI (RISC-V Supervisor 
> Binary Interface) specification and the Linux implementation.
> My rationale is: if U-Boot supports the combination of kernel + ELF loading, 
> why shouldn't we implement this capability as well?

Thanks. I see this is spelled out in
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arch/riscv/boot.html as well. Can
you please do a v2 with an expanded commit message and a Link: to that
URL as well so it's clearer that isn't just an ad-hoc decision?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to