On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 08:29:57AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > сб, 10 серп. 2024 р. о 01:02 Tom Rini <[email protected]> пише: > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:57:03AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > > пт, 9 серп. 2024 р. о 08:49 Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> пише: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 7. August 2024 14:10:24 MESZ schrieb Svyatoslav Ryhel > > > > <[email protected]>: > > > > >TegraPT is compatible with EFI part but it can't pass Protective MBR > > > > >check. > > > > >Skip this check if CONFIG_TEGRA_PARTITION is enabled, storage uclass > > > > >is MMC > > > > >and devnum is 0. Note, eMMC on supported devices MUST be aliased to > > > > >mmc0. > > > > > > > > Why wouldn't you use U-Boot's gpt command to fix the non-conformant > > > > partition table? > > > > > > > > > > I would love to, but I am forced to use TegraPT and DON'T modify it. > > > Tegra114 bootloader is RSA signed and there is no possible way to > > > replace it with open source one unless vendor allows this. SO I am > > > stuck with vendor bootloader to chainload from which enforces TegraPT > > > as well. Modification of existing partition table can irreversibly > > > brick the device. > > > > Can we please incorporate some of this information to the help text, so > > it's clear what the use case is? Thanks. > > Sure, though usually those who know what they are dealing with will > understand. BTW, Tom, may I pick patchsets assigned to Thierry (tagr) > via Tegra custodian tree if they pass? Even if they, apart being > related to Tegra, belong to different subsystems (like this patch and, > for example, tegra gpio driver changes).
Yes, that's fine. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
