Hi Peter,

glad to hear you solved.

As a toolchain i use those provided by kernel.org:

/opt/toolchains/m68k/gcc-12.2.0-nolibc/m68k-linux/bin/m68k-linux-

https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

Just out of curiosity, what's the cpu model you used ?


Regards,
Angelo Dureghello


On 26/07/24 10:22 PM, Peter LaDow wrote:
Scratch that.  I forgot I hard coded the vector table with 0x400 to
test things.  Restoring _start still results in 0x00000000 for the
reset vector.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:16 PM Peter LaDow <[email protected]> wrote:
I should mention I was using the gcc-m68k-linux-gnu package on Ubuntu
22.04.4, which pulled in gcc-11-m68k-linux-gnu.

I just downloaded the bootlin m68k-coldfire--uclibc--stable-2024.02-1,
and tried that.  It generates the proper value in the vector table
(0x400 for _start).  But the call to memset is still bad:

0000f5da <board_init_f_init_reserve>:
    f5da:       2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
    f5dc:       242f 0008       movel %sp@(8),%d2
    f5e0:       4878 00c0       pea c0 <_vectors+0xc0>
    f5e4:       42a7            clrl %sp@-
    f5e6:       2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
    f5e8:       61ff 0001 4622  bsrl 23c0c <_etext+0x138>
    f5ee:       2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
    f5f0:       61ff ffff ffd2  bsrl f5c4 <arch_setup_gd>
    f5f6:       0682 0000 00c0  addil #192,%d2
    f5fc:       4fef 0010       lea %sp@(16),%sp
    f600:       2047            moveal %d7,%a0
    f602:       2142 00a0       movel %d2,%a0@(160)
    f606:       241f            movel %sp@+,%d2
    f608:       4e75            rts

Note "bsrl 23c0c" which points beyond _etext.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:59 PM Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote:
Adding the Coldfire maintainers on Cc.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 4:46 PM Peter LaDow <[email protected]> wrote:
After some digging it appears that this is a toolchain issue.  It seems the
linker fixups are sometimes not computed correctly.  For example, in
board_init_f_init_reserve, the object file disassembled has:

00000000 <board_init_f_init_reserve>:
   0:   2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
   2:   242f 0008       movel %sp@(8),%d2
   6:   4878 00c0       pea c0 <board_init_f_init_reserve+0xc0>
   a:   42a7            clrl %sp@-
   c:   2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
   e:   61ff 0000 0000  bsrl 10 <board_init_f_init_reserve+0x10>
  14:   2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
  16:   61ff 0000 0000  bsrl 18 <board_init_f_init_reserve+0x18>
  1c:   0682 0000 00c0  addil #192,%d2
  22:   4fef 0010       lea %sp@(16),%sp
  26:   2047            moveal %d7,%a0
  28:   2142 00a0       movel %d2,%a0@(160)
  2c:   241f            movel %sp@+,%d2
  2e:   4e75            rts

But when I disassemble the final linked u-boot output:

0000f646 <board_init_f_init_reserve>:
    f646:       2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
    f648:       242f 0008       movel %sp@(8),%d2
    f64c:       4878 00c0       pea c0 <_vectors+0xc0>
    f650:       42a7            clrl %sp@-
    f652:       2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
    f654:       61ff 0001 44da  bsrl 23b30 <_etext+0x138>
    f65a:       2f02            movel %d2,%sp@-
    f65c:       61ff ffff ffd2  bsrl f630 <arch_setup_gd>
    f662:       0682 0000 00c0  addil #192,%d2
    f668:       4fef 0010       lea %sp@(16),%sp
    f66c:       2047            moveal %d7,%a0
    f66e:       2142 00a0       movel %d2,%a0@(160)
    f672:       241f            movel %sp@+,%d2
    f674:       4e75            rts

Note the pea c0 instruction.  The object file has
board_init_f_init_reserve+0xc0 as the argument, but the final linker has
0xc0, meaning board_init_f_init_reserve is being set to 0 after linking.

Also, note the first bsrl instruction, which is not setup correctly
either.  This is a call to memset.  This points to _etext+0x138, which is
not a code region Note that 0x239f8 + 0x138 = 0x23b30.  But in the final
uboot, memset is at 0x1f030.

In the call to memset(),  objdump shows the relocation:

RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text.board_init_f_init_reserve]:
OFFSET   TYPE              VALUE
00000010 R_68K_PLT32       memset
00000018 R_68K_PLT32       arch_setup_gd

So it seems only when linking outside the same compilation unit that the
relocations aren't set correctly.

I'm not sure where to look for a solution.  Or how to search for an
answer.  I've done some digging on Google, but nothing points to a clear
answer.  Anyone seen something similar?

To love for the sake of being loved is human, but to love for the sake of
loving is angelic. -- Alphonse de Lamartine.


On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 14:35 Peter LaDow <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm trying to add support for a custom Colfire based board.  I have
things building, but the final linked vectors in start.S do not point
to _start.  In start.S I have:

_vectors:
.long   0x00000000              /* Flash offset is 0 until we setup CS0 */
.long   _START

.long   _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT
.long   _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT
.long   _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT, _FAULT

Dumping the symbols in the final u-boot yields:

$ m68k-linux-gnu-nm -n u-boot
00000000 A __fixup_entries
00000000 A __got2_entries
00000000 t _vectors
00000400 T _start
0000047e T relocate_code
000004ae t fixloop

But then dumping the raw binary:

u-boot:     file format elf32-m68k

Contents of section .text:
00000 00000000 00000000 00000516 00000516  ................
00010 00000516 00000516 00000516 00000516  ................
00020 00000516 00000516 00000516 00000516  ................
00030 00000516 00000516 00000516 00000516  ................

Note at offset 4 it is 0x00000000, not 0x00000400 as I'd expect.

The final linker script has:

OUTPUT_ARCH(m68k)
ENTRY(_start)
SECTIONS
{
.text :
{
  arch/m68k/cpu/mcf548x/start.o (.text*)
  . = DEFINED(env_offset) ? env_offset : .; env/embedded.o(.text*);
  *(.text*)
}


It is difficult to search the archives, and so far I haven't found
anything.  Any help would be appreciated.

--
To love for the sake of being loved is human, but to love for the sake
of loving is angelic. -- Alphonse de Lamartine.


--
To love for the sake of being loved is human, but to love for the sake
of loving is angelic. -- Alphonse de Lamartine.


Reply via email to