Ok, I tried to rename and what's even stranger is no unit compile
complained!
For instance, Sendto:
function WSocket_Synchronized_sendto(
s : TSocket;
const Buf : TWSocketData;
len, flags : Integer;
var addrto : TSockAddr;
tolen : Integer): Integer;
begin
if @FSendTo = nil then
@FSendTo := WSocketGetProc('sendto');
Result := FSendTo(s, Buf^, len, flags, addrto, tolen);
end;
The definitions in ics winsock.pas are NEVER used! Anyway, they are not the
cause of the problem...
Regards,
SZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6
availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING
>I wonder how would Delphi guys evaluate the correctness of the below in
>IcsWinsock.pas:
>
> implementation
>
> const
> ...
>
> function send; external;
> [DllImport(winsocket, SetLastError = False, EntryPoint = 'sendto')]
> function sendto; external;
> [DllImport(winsocket, SetLastError = False, EntryPoint = 'recv')]
>
> In what namespace are these defined? And what would the impact be when the
> namespaces are flattened by BCB? I think it would b e easier if we simply
> make them:
>
> function sendWSock; external;
> [DllImport(winsocket, SetLastError = False, EntryPoint = 'sendto')]
> function sendtoWSock; external;
> [DllImport(winsocket, SetLastError = False, EntryPoint = 'recv')]
>
> and rename in the code calling instead of trying to modify all function
> calls to WSocket.Send()!
>
> Any objection or idea?
>
> Regards,
>
> SZ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bjørnar Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'ICS support mailing'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6
> availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING
>
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
