Arno Garrels wrote:
> Do you find this text in OverbyteIcsWSocket.pas?
>
> { FP:26/09/06 Are FD_READ and FD_WRITE really necessary ? Probably
> not ! }
> { Lodewijk Ellen reported a problem with W2K3SP1 triggering an AV in
> }
> { accept. Keeping only FD_ACCEPT and FD_CLOSE solved the problem.
> }
> { Anyway, a listening socket doesn't send nor receive any data so
> those }
> { notification are useless.
> }
>
> Sounds like the same problem.
Éric,
Possibly there's still a similar problem at another place in
(Overbyte)IcsWSocket.pas. Can you please change your code like below
and report back whether that helps or not?
procedure TCustomWSocket.Dup(NewHSocket : TSocket);
..
// FSelectEvent := FD_READ or FD_WRITE or FD_CLOSE or FD_CONNECT; ==> Comment
==> FSelectEvent := FD_READ or FD_WRITE or FD_CLOSE; <== Add
It's just a trial.. A client socket must not connect so
SessionConnected-notifications from winsock are not necessary.
--
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
