Fastream Technologies wrote: >Not exactly. No real answer for my actual question... > > I dont think you can support virtual hosts for http 1.0, is this what you are saying. You could support http 1.0 if you had a public IP per host if you really needed to.
> >On 10/4/06, Kris Leech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hi, did you find the answer to this? >> >>Fastream Technologies wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>I have a few issues left for understanding how a transparent proxy works. >>> >>> >>I >> >> >>>talked with a friend in an ISP how they configure them and he said they >>> >>> >>use >> >> >>>Layer4 switches to redirect all HTTP port 80 traffic to the proxy even >>>though the end user does not configures his browser settings for the >>> >>> >>proxy. >> >> >>>Now with our reverse proxy experience, all is well except one thing: How >>>does the proxy know which IP to connect to when the end user uses >>> >>> >>HTTP/1.0 >> >> >>>with no "host" header? Is transparent proxies HTTP/1.1 only? How does the >>>Layer4 switch understands what protocol does the end user uses if it can >>>read just up to layer 4 (TCP)? >>> >>>Best Regards, >>> >>>SZ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >>please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >>Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be >> >> >> > > > > > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
