i have read it, as the "Answer" said, seems like deque is not
thread-safe either, because deque has the operator +=, and others like that.
i got some material about atomoperation from google:
An operation during which a processor
<http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/M/microprocessor.html> can simultaneously
read <http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/read.html> a location and write
<http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/W/write.html> it in the same bus
<http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/B/bus.html> operation. This prevents any
other processor or I/O <http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/I_O.html> device
<http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/D/device.html> from writing or reading
memory until the operation is complete./
Atomic/ implies indivisibility and irreducibility, so an atomic
operation must be performed entirely or not performed at all.
so deque is not thread-safe either. right?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6319207/are-lists-thread-safe
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Lion Chen <chnlio...@gmail.com
<mailto:chnlio...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi, All,
i can not understand why list is not thread-safe, but deque and queue
are thread-safe?
that's all. thanks.
Lion Chen
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org <mailto:Tutor@python.org>
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
--
http://spawgi.wordpress.com
We can do it and do it better.
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
