On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Walter Prins <wpr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10 January 2012 12:15, Thomas Maier <hay...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This code works without py.test or nosetests. For example if I use print >> instead of 'assert'. >> Both py.test and nosetests failed to execute this correctly. >> Or maybe they do execute it correctly, I just don't understand it..:) >> They both report only single test was executed. >> I would like to see test report for each method executed in 'for' loop. >> Is it possible? > > For nose, I *think* you can basically achieve what you want by turning > test_run() into a generator (by essentially replacing the call to the > test_method() with a suitable "yield" statement. See here: > http://readthedocs.org/docs/nose/en/latest/writing_tests.html#test-generators Works perfect.
> Additionally you might also look at the TestLoader functionality for > taking further control over how and where your tests are loaded, e.g. > see for example nose.loader.loadTestsFromGenerator() or > nose.loader.loadTestsFromGeneratorMethod() (or indeed all the other > methods) here: > http://readthedocs.org/docs/nose/en/latest/api/loader.html Will try later. > HTH, my $0.02 worth, > > Walter Thank you very much! Thomas _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
