On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:27, Richard D. Moores <rdmoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:55, Eike Welk <eike.w...@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Looking at my solution now, I think it is too complicated for your relatively >> simple use-case. I think a better solution would be to put the nested for >> loops into a function and use return to exit the computation. >> >> I wrote a new untested version here: >> http://tutoree7.pastebin.com/RL3b2bx6 > > Of course! Now, without looking at your code, I'll try to do it > myself, and then look. > > Thanks very much, Eike. > > Dick Mine is <http://tutoree7.pastebin.com/QtAAtATd>; yours is <http://tutoree7.pastebin.com/RL3b2bx6>. Almost identical! Thanks again, Eike. Dick _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
