On Friday 16 October 2009, Katt wrote:
> > print "There are",
> > textcolor(4)
> > print apples_left,
> > textcolor(7)
> > print "left in the basket."
>
> The above code is very easy to understand when looking at it, but
> from what I see of other programmers this would not be as pythonic.
I think it's perfectly Pythonic, because it is easy to understand. I
always try to make my programs look so simple that an 8 year old
child could understand them. But I'm not always successful.
One problem with a simple structure is, that a function might become
long. And then it is difficult to understand because of its length.
This is one reason why programming is an art. (Offcourse you can
disagree and enjoy cleverly written Programs, that only the most
smart people can understand. Programs, that are like the intricate
gears of expensive Swiss wristwatches. But you should rather learn
C++ in this case. :-))
I have an other idea for a color function. It cam be embedded in the
print statement because it returns an empty string:
def color(color_num):
'''Change text color and return empty string.'''
textcolor(color_num)
return ''
print "There are", color(4), apples_left, \
color(7), "left in the basket."
#or
print "There are " + color(4) + str(apples_left) \
+ color(7) + " left in the basket."
Kind regards,
Eike.
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
