Maybe there's a prettier way to do this, but I did it explicitly like
this because the "transpose" I needed was specific to the structure of
the game payoff matrix; it isn't a normal mathematical transpose. I
agree that it's hard to read but I'm not sure the specific needs of
this application allow a cleaner solution. I'd love to hear it if
there was one though!
On Oct 15, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Che M wrote:
> def transpose(self):
>
> And that's where I'm at. How can I have the transpose method return
> another Payoffs object? Here's the beginning of it:
>
> def transpose(self):
> trans=[[(self[0][0][1],self[0][0][0]), (self[1][0][1],self[1]
> [0][0])],
> [(self[0][1][1],self[0][1][0]), (self[1][1][1],self[1]
> [1][0])]]
Did this have to be hardcoded like this, or is there a more
Pythonic way to transpose the payoff list? Maybe it needs
to look like this, but this does not strike me as very readable.
--
-dave----------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, as soon as they graduate, our people return
to a world driven by a tool that is the antithesis of thinking:
PowerPoint. Make no mistake, PowerPoint is not a neutral tool —
it is actively hostile to thoughtful decision-making. It has
fundamentally changed our culture by altering the expectations
of who makes decisions, what decisions they make and how
they make them. -Colonel T. X. Hammes, USMC
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
