On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:26 AM, <pyt...@bdurham.com> wrote: > > > Are you sure it isn't python 3.x you're playing with? The reason why > simple print function "works" in python 2.x is because of a syntactical > coincidence, it is still a 100% statement. > > Yes, I'm sure :) I restarted IDLE and pasted my session output below:
<snip> You didn't tell that you imported __future__'s print_function! I thought I was having a hallucination or something... seeing that behavior in python2.6
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
