At 10:27 AM 10/27/2007, Jeff Younker wrote: >On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Dick Moores wrote: >>At 08:39 AM 10/27/2007, Aditya Lal wrote: >>> Hence if type(n) is already long it does not have to get converted >>>to int to accommodate something small. >> >>And that's not a bug? > >There is no need for a type change to represent zero, so, no, that's >not a bug.
I think I was referring to something like 1000000. And then there's 2**32-1. Dick _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
