Stephen McInerney wrote: > My friend said the runtime efficiency of Doxygen on his build was much > worse on the Python code than the C++ code, i.e. it took ages to parse > the Python code. It's not the efficiency of doxygen that's the question. The problem is that you can add fields to objects as you go in Python so you need to do a deep analysis of the code to determine the class structure which you don't have to do with C++ (or Java).
Kev. > > Anyone agree/disagree, or have any efficiency tips on how to structure > things for decent Doxygen performance? > > (I haven't used Doxygen myself and I don't have access to the build in > question). > > Regards, > Stephen > > _________________________________________________________________ > Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! > http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us > -- http://www.grfx.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
