On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Brian van den Broek wrote: > on one read of "neither" it is marking the possibility that you know > Python, you know (X)Emacs and you merely need to learn how to make the > two work together. (Thus, neither is such that you are trying to learn > it.) > > Bet a 1$ that reading was the intended one.
Having been on this list long enough to see that Wesley is one of the most helpful of contributors (I'm not going to mention any other names (Hi, Alan! Hi, Kent) for fear of leaving anyone out), I'd feel comfortable raising that bet to $5. I'd go higher, but I need to keep somemoney for lunch. _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
