> I think in the OO world it is called Polymorphism, Nope, its called overloading. Polymorphism is where you send the same message to diferent types of object and get different behaviour.
> where you have a single function name, but multiple definitions > that are distinguished from one another by the number of arguments, > type of arguments, and sometimes ( Smalltalk ) the return type > of the function. Actually the return type in Smalltalk is always an object so its irrelevant, however what you say is true of Objective C as an example. > B. My first question was whether or not you can do this in Python with the > __init__ function. In C++ you can have multiple contructors for a class, > with the arguments deciding which contructor is called. Here is an example: The answer is no, but you can examoine the arguments at run time and call any one of several helper functions from within init() which achieves the same effect. Python cannot easily support this feature because it relies on binding of type to name but in Python names are simply keys in a dictionary, the object asociated can be of any type and even change type over time. THuds we must rely on runtime introspection of the type of the object to decide which version of "init()" we need. HTH, Alan G Author of the Learn to Program web tutor http://www.freenetpages.co.uk/hp/alan.gauld _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
