Ok you got me thinking. I used the same thing I posted before but
created a one liner that as a side affect makes adict like before.
[adict.__setitem__(x,adict.get(x,0)+1) for x in l]
I think it's kinda funny and ugly, ohh and not particuarly clear
about
what it does.
Wolfram Kraus wrote:
> get(key, default) is your friend here:
> for i in a_list:
> items_dict[i] = items_dict.get(i, 0) + 1
>
> get() (and his "brother" setdefault()) are mighty
dictionary-methods.
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
