** Description changed: + [Updated description] + Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer + + ––– + + Desired solution: + + Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be + consistent with our disabled states on buttons.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
