This is the case now in vivid, "init" is essential and ensures that
systemd-sysv or upstart-sysv is installed.
** Changed in: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to init-system-helpers in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357713
Title:
Use essential "init" package to ensure that an init system is present
Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in init-system-helpers package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
I'm using Ubuntu 14.10 dev with ifupdown 0.7.48.1ubuntu4 and upstart
1.13.1-0ubuntu3 and currently it is possible to remove ifupdown and
upstart as they are not essential packages or any essential/manual
package does depend on them. Here is the output:
root@ubuntu:/# apt-get remove ifupdown
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
ifupdown upstart
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 895 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
As I know Ubuntu wants to change from upstart to systemd in the future so
removing upstart may be fine but I'm wondering why ifupdown can be removed
(wouldn't this remove the ability to create a network connection?).
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1357713/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
